|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Lan Wang
Stillwater Corporation
That Escalated Quickly.
769
   |
Posted - 2015.06.15 10:50:22 -
[1] - Quote
blueballing is pvp too
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
Lan Wang
Stillwater Corporation
That Escalated Quickly.
815
|
Posted - 2015.06.19 14:03:22 -
[2] - Quote
Valkin Mordirc wrote:Omar Alharazaad wrote:I still suck at hunting war targets.
I try, but more often than not I end up scaring the fish.
Then I get frustrated and go back to annoying bears until people who are more competent than me log on. You can hunt me any time Omar. *wink wink*
no! pick me pick me pick me
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
Lan Wang
V I R I I
Triumvirate.
836
|
Posted - 2015.06.24 10:18:42 -
[3] - Quote
Princess of Hades wrote:Maybe we need corp fatigue ? Every time you close down a corp, it takes longer for you to recreate one.
maybe wardec fatigue aswell?
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
Lan Wang
V I R I I
Triumvirate.
837
|
Posted - 2015.06.24 14:13:01 -
[4] - Quote
assigning mercs to different wardecs, sort of like delgating work as such, you wardec who you want but you need to assign corp members to fight that war, those corp member are not involved in your other wardecs and vice versa (proper contract style?), that would mean merc corps can actually exhaust the resources they can use, say a 50man corp would need a minimum amount of available corp members to fight say 10+ if you dont have that available because they are fighting other wars then you get a message "sorry you do not have enough personel to fight this war" etc etc its probably a bad idea...
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
Lan Wang
V I R I I
Triumvirate.
837
|
Posted - 2015.06.24 14:19:46 -
[5] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:That doesn't even make sense.
it did in my head 
say you want to wardec a 50 man corp, you have to delegate a certain amount of your own corp/alliance members to participate in that war and so on.
you only have 200 pilots in your alliance and you delegate say 70 to that war, that leaves you with 130 pilots left to delegate to any other wardecs, means you have to pick wisely who you wardec as your limited by your pilots on how many wardecs you can run.
or something like that...
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
Lan Wang
V I R I I
Triumvirate.
837
|
Posted - 2015.06.24 14:30:26 -
[6] - Quote
thats not making anything consensual, you wardec who you want and they might be more encouraged to fight, you want penalties for people hiding from wardecs, you should also have penalties for mass wardecs.
when you enter low and null you are in theory accepting pvp at the gate.
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
Lan Wang
V I R I I
Triumvirate.
837
|
Posted - 2015.06.25 13:07:42 -
[7] - Quote
is his name really Redacted?
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
Lan Wang
V I R I I
Triumvirate.
837
|
Posted - 2015.06.25 14:41:15 -
[8] - Quote
Vimsy Vortis wrote:Veers Belvar wrote:Vimsy Vortis wrote:The only complaint I have about people rolling corps is when they do it before a war actually becomes live. Having never actually been able to shoot those people I feel like I should get the cost of declaring war refunded. In all other instances I couldn't care less. Just be more careful about who you dec, it's meant to be a scalpel, not an axe. I personally am extremely careful about who I declare war on and I think I've had people roll their corps on me maybe 3 times ever. Considering I declare several hundred wars a year that's pretty good. The specific part about rolling a corp before a war goes live that I dislike is that the cost of declaring wars was justified by CCP as "paying for targets" while I personally don't see it like that paying a fee but never getting any targets is contrary to that. If the fee I pay to declare a war is because I am paying for targets, if I get no targets I shouldn't have to pay.
why should you get money back for making a bad decision and picking a worthless corp to wardec? you sound like one of the entitled carebears who think they should have things because they threw a bit of isk at it.
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
Lan Wang
V I R I I
Triumvirate.
838
|
Posted - 2015.06.25 15:39:49 -
[9] - Quote
but forcing people into a war who dont want to be in a war also conflicts that core concept, just becuase wardeccers can do what they want why cant carebears, sorta thing, if someone chooses a playstyle they like then why should someone be allowed to come along and disturb that playstyle, that is simply not playing how you want but playing how someone else wants
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
Lan Wang
V I R I I
Triumvirate.
838
|
Posted - 2015.06.25 17:31:46 -
[10] - Quote
Serendipity Lost wrote:Lan Wang wrote:but forcing people into a war who dont want to be in a war also conflicts that core concept, just becuase wardeccers can do what they want why cant carebears, sorta thing, if someone chooses a playstyle they like then why should someone be allowed to come along and disturb that playstyle, that is simply not playing how you want but playing how someone else wants It's a pvp sandbox game. You need to understand that every month when your subscription gets extended. In this game you fight other players for your right to play in the sandbox. Thats the inner soul of the game. Me, Leto, your grandma or anyone else cares all that much if you buy into it or not. Logging in is consent to be a part of a pvp sandbox game. That's it - the whole explanation. If you don't like it - there are literally 100s of non pvp sand box games out there - feel free to go enjoy them, BUT if you come into our pvp sandbox and demand it gets changed because you don't want to be in a pvp sanbox - we will take a dump on you. (and you have it coming to you). I'm not being a douche here. It is a pvp game. If that's not what you want to buy into and play, then pick another game. It's a total @55 move by you folks to subscribe and then try to radically change the game because you don't like pvp. Me, Leto and your grandma aren't the problem - you are.
Who doesnt like pvp? I think you mistake me for some sort of carebear which im not, i just dont care if someone wants to run missions or wants to mine because thats how they want to play, i dont complain if i wardec someone then they drop corp because i go to where the pvp isnt restricted and fight people who fight back, but that doesnt change the fact that if someone can try and make someone pvp then the other party can counter that. Blueballing is pvp and thats exactly what dropping corp is.
If you dont like that people can blueball you then pick your targets better
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
|
|
Lan Wang
V I R I I
Triumvirate.
838
|
Posted - 2015.06.25 21:09:42 -
[11] - Quote
Serendipity Lost wrote:Lan Wang wrote:Serendipity Lost wrote:Lan Wang wrote:but forcing people into a war who dont want to be in a war also conflicts that core concept, just becuase wardeccers can do what they want why cant carebears, sorta thing, if someone chooses a playstyle they like then why should someone be allowed to come along and disturb that playstyle, that is simply not playing how you want but playing how someone else wants It's a pvp sandbox game. You need to understand that every month when your subscription gets extended. In this game you fight other players for your right to play in the sandbox. Thats the inner soul of the game. Me, Leto, your grandma or anyone else cares all that much if you buy into it or not. Logging in is consent to be a part of a pvp sandbox game. That's it - the whole explanation. If you don't like it - there are literally 100s of non pvp sand box games out there - feel free to go enjoy them, BUT if you come into our pvp sandbox and demand it gets changed because you don't want to be in a pvp sanbox - we will take a dump on you. (and you have it coming to you). I'm not being a douche here. It is a pvp game. If that's not what you want to buy into and play, then pick another game. It's a total @55 move by you folks to subscribe and then try to radically change the game because you don't like pvp. Me, Leto and your grandma aren't the problem - you are. Who doesnt like pvp? I think you mistake me for some sort of carebear which im not, i just dont care if someone wants to run missions or wants to mine because thats how they want to play, i dont complain if i wardec someone then they drop corp because i go to where the pvp isnt restricted and fight people who fight back, but that doesnt change the fact that if someone can try and make someone pvp then the other party can counter that. Blueballing is pvp and thats exactly what dropping corp is. If you dont like that people can blueball you then pick your targets better I like the blue ball mechanic. I also like that no one is immune to anything. I like the chaos. If you feel that some folks are entitled the ability to be free of the chaos then I feel that you are wrong. NO ONE gets a free pass for anything.
nobody gets a free pass, they can be engaged anytime they undock, they just avoided the pay2kill mechanic 
EVEALON Creative - Logo Design & Branding | Digital Design
|
|
|
| |
|